Working papers

1. Informed principal and mechanism design with default continuation game , 2026 , Slides

   I study informed principal and mechanism design problems with transferable utility and verifiable principal types, where rejecting the principal’s offer leads to a default continuation game. Examples include an entrepreneur making a private offer to an investor before a public offering, and a bidder proposing collusion before an auction. I show that the principal’s worst equilibrium payoff is equal to the concavification of the value function of the mechanism design problem. I solve the mechanism design problem under the Nondominance or regularity assumptions on the default game as a solution to the optimization subject to (flexible) IR constraint.

2. Non-distortionary elicitation of beliefs in dynamic problems , with Colin Stewart , 2026 , Slides

   We study elicitation of beliefs that are related to choices in a dynamic decision problem. We consider three cases with respect to the relationship between actions and beliefs: (i) beliefs are independent of actions, (ii) actions affect information but not the payoff-relevant state, and (iii) actions affect the distribution of states. In each case, we provide necessary and sufficient conditions for incentivizing truthful reports of beliefs without distorting behavior in the original decision problem. For two-period decision problems, questions asked in the first period can be incentivized if and only if they are about expectations of payoffs plus some function of the belief, where the class of functions that can be added varies across the three cases. In contrast, incentivizing truthful reports in the second period always distorts incentives in the first period unless the first-period action affects neither the information nor the incentives in the second period.

3. Non-distortionary belief elicitation , with Colin Stewart , 2024 , Slides

   A researcher wants to ask a decision-maker about a belief related to a choice the decision-maker made. When can the researcher provide incentives for the decision-maker to report her belief truthfully without distorting her choice? We identify which questions can be incentivized in this way in three canonical classes of problems. For these questions, we construct a simple mechanism the researcher can use.

4. Bargaining with Mechanisms and Two Sided Incomplete Information , 2024 , Slides

   I study a random proposer multi-round bargaining over a single good with transfers. In each round, a proposer may offer an arbitrary mechanism to determine the final allocation. If the offer is accepted, it is implemented and the game ends; otherwise, the next round commences. When there is a two-sided incomplete information with binary types for each player, the ex ante expected equilibrium payoffs are unique.

5. Reputational Bargaining with Incomplete Information about Preferences , 2021

   We study a reputational war-of-attrition bargaining over a pie with heterogeneous parts, incomplete information over preferences, and behavioral types. To screen across preference types, each player may demand that the opponent chooses from an arbitrary menu of offers. When there is one-sided uncertainty about preferences (and two-sided about the behavioral type), there is a unique limit equilibrium, in which the player with known preferences proposes a menu of all allocations that give him at least his worst complete information bargaining payoff. The outcome is ex ante and ex post efficient. Being able to commit to a menu instead of a single-offer increases equilibrium payoffs of the player with known preferences. Multiple equilibria are possible with two-sided incomplete information about preferences.

6. Local stability of stationary equilibria , with Balazs Szentes , 2013

   This paper characterizes stable stationary equilibria in large population dynamic games. Each player has a type which changes over time. A player’s flow payoff as well as the evolution of her type depends on the distribution of population types and population strategies. A stationary equilibrium is called stable if, after perturbing the equilibrium strategies slightly, revision dynamics converge back to the equilibrium. We derive simple sufficient (and almost necesarry) conditions for stability. These conditions involve eigenvalues of a one-dimensional familiy of matrices. Moreover, in order to check whether an equilibrium is stable, it is enough to consider sine wave perturbations of the equilibrium.

7. Smooth Stable Matching , 2011

   We analyze a continuous version of the Gale-Shapley matching problem. Men and women are represented by a d-dimensional vector of characteristics (such as intelligence, beauty, wealth, etc.) and their preferences over matches with the opposite sex depend only on the respective characteristics. We assume that preferences are monotonic. We show that each differentiable and pairwise stable matching has to satisfy a system of partial di§erential equations. For generic values of parameters, there exists at most one smooth (i.e., analytic) stable matching.

8. Asynchronous Repeated Games with Rich Private Monitoring and Finite Past , 2009

   This paper analyzes asynchronous repeated games with private and rich monitoring. We assume that strategies have finite past, i.e., in each period, continuation strategies must be measurable with respect to finite partitions of past histories. This class includes Önite automata and bounded recall strategies. Additionally, we assume that the monitoring has an infinite number of signals. We show that any equilibrium with Önite past and generic infinite monitoring has to satisfy a version of the belief-free property: in each period t; the set of best responses does not depend on the information received before period t; with a possible exception of the information received in the first periods of the game. Under an additional payo§ smoothness assumption, the equilibrium strategy are essentially pastindependent: each periodís action depends only on the formation received immediately prior to the choice of the action.

9. Decomposition of uncertainty in relational systems , 2009

   A joint distribution of an infinite collection of random variables \teta(x) for x \in X is exchangeable, if the joint distributions of any two finite tuples of variables of the same length are equal. A famous result by de Finetti shows that each random variable \teta(x) can be decomposed as an outcome of two kinds of independent shocks: an aggregate shock that affects all variables in the same way and a collection of i.i.d. idiosyncratic shocks that affect each variable separately. In this paper, we present a generalization of the de Finettis Theorem. We assume that all tuples of variables of a given length are divided into finitely many classes of analogy. A joint distribution of all random variables is invariant if the distributions of analogous tuples of variables are equal. Under the finite dimensionality assumption on the system of analogies, we show that each random variable \teta(x) can be decomposed into finitely many independent shocks. These may include the aggregate shock that a§ects all variables, idiosyncratic shocks that affect each variable separately, and shocks that affect the non-trivial subset of variables.

10. Complementarities, Group Formation and Preferences for Similarity , 2008

    We present a model of two sociological phenomena: the tendencies to form groups and to favor others who are similar. Individuals divide society into friends and enemies. Individual payoffs depend on their own choices and on the choices of others. We assume different types of complementarities: Other things equal, each individual prefers to be friendly towards those who are friendly toward her (second-degree complementarity) and toward those who are friendly toward those … who are friendly toward her (higher-degree complementarity). With second degree complementarities, but no higher-degree externalities, individuals want to reciprocate friendship. Any additional amount of higher-degree complementarities pushes individuals to form groups. Next, we assume everybody may make mistakes that make him confuse individuals who are similar to each other. To minimize the cost of the mistakes, individuals want to keep their friends as different from their enemies as possible. Combined with group formation, individuals would like to be friendly toward others who are similar to them. Although individuals act as if they have preferences for similar others, in reality, their behavior is a best response to the equilibrium behavior of others.

11. Learning Through Theories , 2007

    This paper examines the relationship between language and knowledge in a learning model. An agent describes the world through theories. A theory consists of universal propositions called patterns, and it is formulated in some language. We look at two characteristics of a good theory. A theory is informative if it ensures correct predictions. A theory is brief if it consists of one pattern. We offer different characterizations of informative theories. In particular, we identify languages for which there is no trade-off between both characteristics: Any informative theory logically implies a theory that is informative as well as brief. The results are illustrated with speciÖc problems of reasoning under uncertainty.

12. Small Group Coordination , 2005 , Job Market Paper

    This paper studies a coordination process of a large population. We assume that subgroups of the population differ in the intensity of their coordination problems. Specifically, small (but not large) groups are able to coordinate and simultaneously take a coalitional best response an action, which improves the welfare of all the members of the group. When agents interact on a network, in the long-run they always play an action which is either payoff- or risk-dominant. The outcome depends on the network. In general, the ability of small groups to coordinate may decrease the chances of selecting the efficient outcome. When players interact on many networks at the same time, the dynamics may uniquely select an action, which is neither payoff nor risk dominant. This happens when such an action is sufficiently attractive for small groups. We characterize situations when efficiency is helped or obstructed by the presence of small groups. As an application, we discuss how networks of interactions may affect the probability of self-segregation and polarization.